Chris,
2017-09-14 0:37 GMT+02:00 Chris Martin <chrsm...@outlook.com>: > > As for the JS being apart of the name, I’m not too worried about it. Since > we’re still in pre 1.0, I’d imagine we’re still working on stabilizing and > getting that conversion to JS to work seamlessly? Once that has stabilized > I can totally see us “cross compiling” to Android, iPhone, etc. were > naturally we’d want to loose the “JS” part of the name. That I can only > figure would land around 3 years down the road? I honestly don’t have a > good beat on where the FlexJS project is at right now. I feel like it’s > close but just not there yet. > > If we all already think the JS suffix is a mistake for a robust name, we should address it now, since it cost many time to get people know and respect a brand. So stick with xxxJS to change it in three years, is for me something we shouldn't do at all, IMHO.
