I’m fine with voting now. I think the reasons for and against have more or less been addressed. The only point which has not really been addressed was Alex’s question.
Personally I don’t think the project name is really a concern as far as some unknown direction the project might take. If it develops to a point where the JS suffix is a problem, we can try and figure out the answer to that question at that time. Thanks, Harbs > On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J <mark.kessler....@usmc.mil> > wrote: > > Probably could vote on the name change. But if that passes, it would need a > discussion thread for the new name. > > > -Mark K > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Piotr Zarzycki [mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 6:06 AM > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork > > Agreed with Mark completely! Especially in case of IDEs. > > I will summarize discussion tomorrow for the notice to the board that we > have consensus or not. > > If there will not be more voices for change than for staying with current > one do we still need start a Vote - Something like: Change name or not ? > Dave what do you think about that ? > > Thanks, > Piotr >
