Hi, > Are there some files that are being caught by RAT? If so, what are they?
I mentioned them in my vote email. [1] 3 patch files don’t have ASF headers. > IMO, the main thing folks want from Maven are the JARs which aren't an > official ASF release anyway. Seems like we should vote on a source > package, then set any version numbers and have Maven build the final jars > from there. The differences in the source should only be in POMs and > other configs right? Which is IMO not permitted by ASF release policy as the binary connivance releases need to be made from the tagged source release. [2] (and elsewhere) Thanks, Justin 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/47ad4369d92791280f8cdfb0d1e208cafb7d58860f0f743b54a76599@%3Cdev.flex.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/47ad4369d92791280f8cdfb0d1e208cafb7d58860f0f743b54a76599@%3Cdev.flex.apache.org%3E> 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#compiled-packages <http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#compiled-packages>
