Hi - > On Jun 12, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > I'm confused. Can I get a summary? > > Are there some files that are being caught by RAT? If so, what are they? > > Are we sure the process should be that the RM should switch away from > SNAPSHOT before the vote? If a major problem is found in that RC, > wouldn't we have deployed bad artifacts under the final version number and > have to pull them back? Or abandon that release version and use the next > version number?
The Tomcat project will user version numbers. If a version fails then they advance to the next. They still produce changelings for the version that is not released. You can see the gory details for version 7 here: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/changelog.html Regards, Dave > > IMO, the main thing folks want from Maven are the JARs which aren't an > official ASF release anyway. Seems like we should vote on a source > package, then set any version numbers and have Maven build the final jars > from there. The differences in the source should only be in POMs and > other configs right? > > What am I missing? > -Alex > > On 6/12/17, 3:53 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > >> It should be between the Last call and opening the vote. It is equal to >> “cutting the release candidate”. >> >> So, the LAST CALL thread is finished and the RM writes that he’s going to >> cut a release … AFTER THAT he does these steps and THEN he opens the vote >> thread. I never said anything else than that. >> >> Chris >> >> >> Am 12.06.17, 12:30 schrieb "piotrz" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: >> >> Chris, >> >> I'm a bit confused. You have said that I shouldn't do this as part of >> VOTING, LAST CALL: >> >> "No, >> >> The removing the SNAPSHOT, tagging and setting the new version should >> be, >> more or less, one step. >> " >> >> Now you are saying just opposite. So again when I should do this >> (Last Call, >> Voting) step ? >> >> "1) In order to have a proper Maven release, the versions of the >> maven build >> should be changed to “0.8.0” (omit the SNAPSHOT). " >> >> Piotr >> >> >> >> ----- >> Apache Flex PMC >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> -- >> View this message in context: >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle >> x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FDISCUSS-Discuss-Release-Apache-FlexJ >> S-0-8-0-RC1-tp62274p62341.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C764b156340ed4161762808d4b >> 1813b7a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636328616008847001&sd >> ata=pnXSK31V8HvCRI9NlEVlGD0SgCczOCQYlw0PyoVZnfQ%3D&reserved=0 >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
