Hi, > If Justin takes Adobe-owned code and relicenses it
Alex it was you who relicensed it from MIT to Apache so I would not be relicensing it just keeping the original license it was under. INAL and Adobe may own the copyright on the patch, but if it's considered just a list as you say then they probably don’t (non creative items like lists can’t be copyrighted is my understanding) so I’m not sure how you can have it both ways. Could you explain? Either way they certailly don’t own the copyright of the original code. Again INAL but I think you may be missing Ray's point that the contents of the file (including the comments retained by the patch) would still be under MIT license. That irrespective of it it’s treated as code or not. Anyway let see what Roy replies with and go with that. Thanks, Justin
