It was not clear why you are trying to avoid the MIT headers. Maybe you should clarify that in the @legal thread.
> On Apr 27, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > On 4/26/17, 4:45 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> Not yet. I will be seeking clarification on whether I can manually >>> create >>> the final result without it being called a derivative work. >> >> I assume you be asking this on the current legal discuss thread? Wouldn’t >> it be less effort to just do as Roy advises and add the MIT header? > > I am only currently authorized to donate Adobe-owned stuff to Apache. If > the externs turn out to be owned by CreateJS, I will have to delete them > from the repo, and some non-Adobe person will have to figure out what to > do, or I will have to go through an Adobe-side process of getting approved > to donate this to CreateJS, which is more hassle than just manually > creating the files. > >> >> Even it you manually create the file it still may come down to an ASF >> policy question rather than a legal question which may also need to be >> resolved. > > Well, we'll see what Roy says. > > -Alex >
