On Jan 25, 2017 10:21 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
Hi Alex, But all the IDEs are alive and are being maintained. Flash Builder is the only one that's but been maintained. But I'd be ok with an additional descriptor if more people here think we should keep legacy stuff in a new product. I think we should maintain support for FB as much as possible. A lot of Flex developers already use it, so supporting that IDE would be a good idea to increase adoption of FlexJS. Thanks, Om Chris Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> Datum: 25.01.17 17:34 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] Change flex sdk descriptor? On 1/25/17, 7:51 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >Well the thing is, that I don’t want to have to rely on a single >dimension of values to switch multiple dimensions of functionality. What >happens if people start using x > 4.8 for detecting FlexJS and assume we >release a regular Flex 4.8? What happens then? Things can get really ugly >in that case and I am sure it’s gonna happen soon ;-) > >I guess we shouldn’t force a hack in our SDK just because a no longer >supported legacy IDE otherwise doesn’t know how to handle it. We don't have control over many other IDEs as well, so a change here requires every other IDE to change. Seems like we have more control over IntelliJ. What if we introduce a new file called flexjs-sdk-descriptor.xml and leave the old one with the hack for legacy support. Then all IDE vendors can move to checking the new file when they have time? Thoughts? -Alex
