On 1/25/17, 7:51 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Well the thing is, that I don’t want to have to rely on a single >dimension of values to switch multiple dimensions of functionality. What >happens if people start using x > 4.8 for detecting FlexJS and assume we >release a regular Flex 4.8? What happens then? Things can get really ugly >in that case and I am sure it’s gonna happen soon ;-) > >I guess we shouldn’t force a hack in our SDK just because a no longer >supported legacy IDE otherwise doesn’t know how to handle it. We don't have control over many other IDEs as well, so a change here requires every other IDE to change. Seems like we have more control over IntelliJ. What if we introduce a new file called flexjs-sdk-descriptor.xml and leave the old one with the hack for legacy support. Then all IDE vendors can move to checking the new file when they have time? Thoughts? -Alex
