Hi Alex,
Yeah … I know we are hacking this, but I would like to change this to use the
0.8.0 as a default and to add a build configuration “apply flashbuilder hacks”
to make it output a 4.8.0.8.0. Because I otherwise I fear that more and more
tool vendors will rely on this hack and make us have to live with it for the
next years. I would like to make the descriptor contain a version 0.8.0 and add
some sort of “<type>flexjs</type>” element to the descriptor to give
tool-vendors more information on the type of Flex SDK
Chris
Am 25.01.17, 16:09 schrieb "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com>:
Not sure I understand. We are already hacking the <version> to be 4.x for
FlashBuilder.
I would imagine you could add another tag without breaking things.
-Alex
On 1/25/17, 7:06 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I’m currently working on fixing FlexJS support in IntelliJ. I just
>encountered a line of code in which the component sets are selected based
>on the version-number (if it’s greater than 4.5). I don’t want to go down
>the path of hacking the version number of flexJS to be something like
>4.8.0.8.0 so I would rather have the version 0.8.0 but a SDK type in the
>descriptor. Unfortunately I don’t know if adding an element to this would
>break things. What other alternatives would we have to provide this
>information?
>
>Chris
