On 7/21/16, 10:19 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Unless folks have a problem with it, I’m going to try and refactor some
>naming. If what I do is too drastic, we can revert my changes…
>
>I’ll try and keep my changes in clearly separate commits. I can do it on
>a feature branch if folks prefer.
Well, I'm all for seeing what you are thinking about. A branch, or even
just a list of the proposed APIs in an email is fine if you want to get
something for us to see without having to chase down all references to
Graphics from the other code in the repo.
I haven't looked at Canvas yet, but I happened across [1] where a code
snippet looks like:
var draw = SVG('drawing').size(800, 800).path("M75,0 L75,118.85 A30,30 0 0
0 640,660.15 L568.5690264688633,781.8607965826662 ").attr({ stroke:
'#000', fill: 'none' });
I haven't found an actual "curveTo" call on SVG. Maybe I'm missing it, so
I'm having trouble envisioning how much JS code will be written and run to
emulate Flash graphics vs creating API that would support snippets like
this that people might find on the web and try.
Thanks,
-Alex
[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21706590/how-to-draw-arc-using-svg-js
>
>On Jul 21, 2016, at 7:21 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/16, 7:06 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> For svg and canvas, the drawing commands map pretty cleanly to their
>>>HTML
>>> counterparts, so it would be pretty clean.
>>
>> I haven't spent any serious time thinking about it. Just quickly, I saw
>> flash.display.Graphics.drawPath which seems quite different from SVG
>> drawPath. And that's the sort of thing I was referring to. IMO, no
>>need
>> to require folks to use Vectors of ValueObjects to define the path, just
>> let them use the encoded string format. And if there are
>> incompatibilities between the syntax used by Flex vs SVG, choose the SVG
>> one and have the FlexJS implementation do the scanning of the path
>>string.
>> Don't have the JS implementation make the developer pay for the scan.
>>
>> Again, just my 2 cents,
>> -Alex
>>
>
