Unless folks have a problem with it, I’m going to try and refactor some naming. If what I do is too drastic, we can revert my changes…
I’ll try and keep my changes in clearly separate commits. I can do it on a feature branch if folks prefer. On Jul 21, 2016, at 7:21 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 7/21/16, 7:06 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> For svg and canvas, the drawing commands map pretty cleanly to their HTML >> counterparts, so it would be pretty clean. > > I haven't spent any serious time thinking about it. Just quickly, I saw > flash.display.Graphics.drawPath which seems quite different from SVG > drawPath. And that's the sort of thing I was referring to. IMO, no need > to require folks to use Vectors of ValueObjects to define the path, just > let them use the encoded string format. And if there are > incompatibilities between the syntax used by Flex vs SVG, choose the SVG > one and have the FlexJS implementation do the scanning of the path string. > Don't have the JS implementation make the developer pay for the scan. > > Again, just my 2 cents, > -Alex >
