I think it’s a very good fit. It has the overhead of trying to figure out the legalities of using it in the official repo. If someone wants to deal with that, be my guest… ;-)
On Jul 12, 2016, at 6:31 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 7/12/16, 7:58 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Two reasons: >> >> 1. I like the idea of a single static class for doing these conversions >> rather than instantiating an encoder/decoder every time. >> 2. My understanding is that this class is by far the most performant in >> reading and writing Base64. > > Does the version you put in your repo "have too much overhead" or "doesn't > quite fit"? > > -Alex >
