On 7/12/16, 7:58 AM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Two reasons: > >1. I like the idea of a single static class for doing these conversions >rather than instantiating an encoder/decoder every time. >2. My understanding is that this class is by far the most performant in >reading and writing Base64. Does the version you put in your repo "have too much overhead" or "doesn't quite fit"? -Alex
