On 5/16/16, 11:18 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>JSC is working, but I doubt it’s that big a deal to change the project >type definition. > >I don’t think we should hold off on changing to a structure which makes >more sense because of this. Well, it isn't so much that the project structure makes more sense or not that is driving the externs move. It is really about how easy it is to specify where to find the externs SWCs. By moving them, there is one less "Linked Resource" to specify in FB, but you still have to specify one that points to flex-asjs. Since JSC is working in FDT, I guess I'll revert the move of the externs SWCs. The project structure changes will stay though. The project structure changes should even help FDT be used to develop the framework SWCs. -Alex
