JSC is working, but I doubt it’s that big a deal to change the project type definition.
I don’t think we should hold off on changing to a structure which makes more sense because of this. On May 16, 2016, at 9:16 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > On 5/16/16, 9:52 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes. It’s current. They do not have a template for FlexJS The project >> type probably does not work. >> >> I’ll probably just fix the project definition and create a template and >> end it to them for the next version… > > OK, if it is already not working then I think I will push these changes. > I'll do it later today unless other objections surface. > > Thoughts? > -Alex >
