So, myXML.dim:baz = foo:
while compile to myXML.setChild(“dim:baz”,foo)
Right?
If so, I can handle that.
On Dec 30, 2015, at 8:02 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/30/15, 9:16 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And I’m assuming the signature will be something like this:
>> setChild(nameOrQualifiedName:String,xmlOrXmlList:Object)
>
> AS: myXML.someChild = someXMLorXMLList;
>
> JS: myXML.setChild('someChild', someXMLorXMLList);
>
> No idea of that actually is the case or not, I'm just looking at the
> compiler source ;-). And we can change it if you want.
>
> -Alex
>
>>
>> On Dec 30, 2015, at 6:13 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> OK. I think we discussed this, but it’s been a few weeks… ;-)
>>>
>>> The method will accept either an XML or XMLList object.
>>>
>>> On Dec 30, 2015, at 5:20 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For assignment, there will be a call to setChild().
>>>>
>>>> On 12/30/15, 3:09 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The past month or so, I’ve been side-tracked with lots of things, but
>>>>> I’m
>>>>> finally back on this.
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m not sure what we decided in terms of assignment. AFAIK, there’s no
>>>>> assignment method in XML for replacing XML with a specific name with
>>>>> an
>>>>> XMLList. The closest we have is replace() which takes an XML object
>>>>> and
>>>>> not an XMLLIst. I’m not even sure what it does. (I guess I can try it
>>>>> and
>>>>> see.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 19, 2015, at 9:06 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, I've pushed changes that handle basic for loops and setting
>>>>>> properties. And even += on XMLLists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can get a sense of what works by looking at the unit tests in
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> compiler.jx.tests/src/org/apache/flex/compiler/internal/codegen/js/fle
>>>>>> xjs
>>>>>> /T
>>>>>> estFlexJSGlobalClasses.java
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm sure there are lots of cases I haven't thought of, but it will
>>>>>> hopefully get you started.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/18/15, 3:12 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I pushed changes to not use _as3_ on XML function calls and use
>>>>>>> child()
>>>>>>> for "." access.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm going to look into:
>>>>>>> -for and foreach
>>>>>>> -setting properties on XML/XMLList
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/16/15, 11:47 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/16/15, 11:43 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2015, at 9:14 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm. I wonder what other operators work. Like “-=“.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It looks like -= does not work.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And does xmlList1 + xmlList2 concatenate them?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> += also works for this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hmm. Easiest for the compiler might be an operator(op:String,
>>>>>>>> data:*)
>>>>>>>> method. Let’s table this stuff for now. I might have a better
>>>>>>>> idea
>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>> I’m actually doing the other compiler work.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
