And I’m assuming the signature will be something like this: setChild(nameOrQualifiedName:String,xmlOrXmlList:Object)
On Dec 30, 2015, at 6:13 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK. I think we discussed this, but it’s been a few weeks… ;-) > > The method will accept either an XML or XMLList object. > > On Dec 30, 2015, at 5:20 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> For assignment, there will be a call to setChild(). >> >> On 12/30/15, 3:09 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The past month or so, I’ve been side-tracked with lots of things, but I’m >>> finally back on this. >>> >>> I’m not sure what we decided in terms of assignment. AFAIK, there’s no >>> assignment method in XML for replacing XML with a specific name with an >>> XMLList. The closest we have is replace() which takes an XML object and >>> not an XMLLIst. I’m not even sure what it does. (I guess I can try it and >>> see.) >>> >>> Harbs >>> >>> On Nov 19, 2015, at 9:06 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>>> OK, I've pushed changes that handle basic for loops and setting >>>> properties. And even += on XMLLists. >>>> >>>> You can get a sense of what works by looking at the unit tests in >>>> >>>> compiler.jx.tests/src/org/apache/flex/compiler/internal/codegen/js/flexjs >>>> /T >>>> estFlexJSGlobalClasses.java >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm sure there are lots of cases I haven't thought of, but it will >>>> hopefully get you started. >>>> >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> On 11/18/15, 3:12 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I pushed changes to not use _as3_ on XML function calls and use child() >>>>> for "." access. >>>>> >>>>> I'm going to look into: >>>>> -for and foreach >>>>> -setting properties on XML/XMLList >>>>> >>>>> -Alex >>>>> >>>>> On 11/16/15, 11:47 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/16/15, 11:43 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2015, at 9:14 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hmm. I wonder what other operators work. Like “-=“. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It looks like -= does not work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And does xmlList1 + xmlList2 concatenate them? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> += also works for this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hmm. Easiest for the compiler might be an operator(op:String, data:*) >>>>>> method. Let’s table this stuff for now. I might have a better idea >>>>>> once >>>>>> I’m actually doing the other compiler work. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Alex >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
