Ok, but what about Roland's comment about removing the Sprite reference in the SWC, that doesn't seem kosher to me...?
So the build would download the text files, save them to disk, create a swc from that and package it correct? Mike On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 5/27/15, 3:00 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> I would want to get a ruling on that from higher up in Apache. First > >> there is the risk that your site goes away some day. Then there is the > >> question as to whether PMC folks can set up external entities to get > >> around some of these Apache rules. Now if there was already a swc we > >> could use on the mozilla site then that would be usable. > >> > >> > > > >I mean github but yeah, I have no idea what I am talking about so this one > >is on your shoulders. :) > > > > In digging around this morning, I did find the builtin.as and included > files in a stable enough place for me on Github [1]. However, I could not > find a SWC already compiled from those sources. These sources are under > MPL, so we have to work within these rules [2]. > > The rules don’t say we can’t build the object/binary form ourselves, so I > think that is an option. Then: > 1) the source release would not contain any of these MPL files but we’d > mention in the README that we download these files and generate a SWC. > 2) that SWC goes in the binary convenience package. > > Thoughts? > -Alex > > [1] https://github.com/nxmirrors/tamarin-central > [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b > >
