On 5/27/15, 3:00 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> I would want to get a ruling on that from higher up in Apache. First >> there is the risk that your site goes away some day. Then there is the >> question as to whether PMC folks can set up external entities to get >> around some of these Apache rules. Now if there was already a swc we >> could use on the mozilla site then that would be usable. >> >> > >I mean github but yeah, I have no idea what I am talking about so this one >is on your shoulders. :) > In digging around this morning, I did find the builtin.as and included files in a stable enough place for me on Github [1]. However, I could not find a SWC already compiled from those sources. These sources are under MPL, so we have to work within these rules [2]. The rules don’t say we can’t build the object/binary form ourselves, so I think that is an option. Then: 1) the source release would not contain any of these MPL files but we’d mention in the README that we download these files and generate a SWC. 2) that SWC goes in the binary convenience package. Thoughts? -Alex [1] https://github.com/nxmirrors/tamarin-central [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
