The question though I have is all of this talk about the security issues with Flash, wouldn't that still apply to a Mozilla version too? I get the sense that it only matters if things are insecure if they are some "hated" proprietary technology like Flash. I think that site is probably a good example of one of the online outlets that attacks Flash all the time etc. So do they they really even care about Flash being insecure or do they just not like Flash or Adobe or something like that? Is the Mozilla version more secure just because it's an open source implementation?
David -----Original Message----- From: Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com> To: dev@flex.apache.org, adobeflexengin...@gmail.com Sent: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 7:41 AM Subject: Re: "The Player", a case for an independent Flash Player On 17/01/15 23:46, Stephane Beladaci wrote: > I am preparing to make a case for the development of a new independent > Flash Player for desktop and mobile browsers. I Did you contact the team at Mozilla working on this ? http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/16/mozillas_flashkiller_shumay_appears_in_firefox_nightlies/ Tom
