Hi, I've made the changes to NOTICE and LICENSE for saxon9 but there may be a further legal issue we need to resolve. The James Clark license is MIT/X11 (or similar) license with an anti advertising clause. I think this is a reaction to the BSD license with the advertising clause and should be OK but not 100% sure.
Both [1][2] state that only the BSD license without the advertising clause is allowed. Here's a good (non Apache) explanation as to why the BSD clause is an issue. [3] Justin 1.http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a 3. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html
