>>> IMO, it would be better if I keep making changes and Justin does the >>> review. He’s a much better reviewer and the results will have one >>> authoring style. >> >>Your viewpoints are different enough that discussing this until you've >>reached agreement - which is basically what one person editing and one >>reviewing would be - would take ages, if it happened at all. > > AIUI, the only missing required pieces are the W3C and xml-api*.jar > notices.
So, no worries then, Justin seems to have a clear understanding of how these should be handled, and he plans to tackle some other stuff (low hanging fruit, IIUC) at the same time. Win-win? >>I think this exercise in legal wrangling has gone on long enough. This >>stuff has been unchanged for 7 releases without the world coming to an >>end and to be honest my patience is running thin. > > Yes, well, we could have just unbundled these jars and been done a long > time ago, but we are going through all of this because we’re afraid of > potential download failures. >From the little I understand of this whole thread, that would've meant adding another user nag message, which I don't think is trivial. You had a shot at this, and now Justin gets a shot at this. That means that by Monday we should have an implementation of both visions in the repo and we can have one more round of negotiation before we close this discussion. EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
