A simple addition of the need to run 'addAIRtoSDK' to the README is enough to 'fix' this. No need for a new RC, no need for further delay.
EdB On Wednesday, July 16, 2014, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > On 7/15/14 10:08 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >> Furthermore, adl is part of the AIR sdk and is not owned by Apache Flex, > >> and not under Apache Flex source control. It should not be in the > >>source > >> package nor should it end up in the bin folder after building. > > > >Correct (and adl is not in the source package) but it is required for a > >working SDK. Just because something compiles doesn't mean we should > >release it - it needs to work as well. :-) > > > >> I appreciate your desire to look for problems, but please be careful > >> before pulling the fire alarm. There's been a lot of false alarms. > > > >How exactly is this a false alarm? > Because you claim the source package should contain bin/adl. I"m not > seeing any way we can bundle that in the source package as ADL is under > Adobe licensing. > > > If you following the instructions in the README you end up with an SDK > >that is unable to compile AIR or mobile applications. In my books that > >makes it a regression issue. > A regression from what release of Apache Flex? Or are you trying to > compare the source package against Adobe Flex 4.6? > > > > > > >Not even sure why this is being discussed further, it been confined by > >several people this is an issue with the RC, either you think it is > >something we should fix before releasing and thus should vote -1 on the > >release or you think we should fix later and release the RC now and vote > >+1. > What change would you propose to the RC that would conform to source > package requirements about dependency licenses? > > -Alex > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
