Hi, So we are fine with being inconstant here?
For instance for Flex Unit we have copyright in LICENSE: Some of the code in the directories FlexUnit4UIListener and FlexUnit4CIListener of FLexUnit is based on Flex Unit 1. This code is licensed under the BSD 3-clause license and copyright (c) 2003-2010 by Adobe Systems Incorporated. See the file headers for the full license text. Should the second sentence have the copyright removed and be changed to: "This code is licensed under the BSD 3-clause license. See the file headers for the full license text." I really don't understand why you object to including Google copying information but were in favour of Adobe copying information being added to LICENSE file? This information that is helpful to the user of the software and clarify where the code originally come from. Thanks, Justin
