I agree on the runtimes, but I would have to say I disagree on the IDE front. There are already other IDEs out there that eclipse Flash Builder (pun intended) in terms of robustness. In particular I am thinking of IntelliJ IDEA, but the same could be said of FDT.
I suppose one could argue that we could bring Flash Builder up to the level of those other tools, but would the man-hours required to do so be worth the cost savings of just purchasing one of those other IDEs? On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Sugan Naicker <su...@dev-x.co.za> wrote: > +1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: roksmedia...@gmail.com [mailto:roksmedia...@gmail.com] > Sent: 19 June 2014 05:59 PM > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Forward] Please bring back FXG 2.0 export for Flash Pro CC > 2014 > > We Need it back in Illustrator cc too. > > Richard Oren > > > On 19 Jun 2014, at 4:35 am, DarkStone <darkst...@163.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I just posted a thread on Adobe's Flash Pro CC forum: > > https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1500413 > > > > It's about bring back FXG 2.0 export for Flash Pro CC 2014. > > > > I think it's pretty important for Flex developers, so please reply +1 > > to that thread if you agree as well, thx : ) > > > > > > DarkStone > > 2014-06-19 > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Forward-Please-br > > ing-back-FXG-2-0-export-for-Flash-Pro-CC-2014-tp38453.html > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
