The person who answered on legal-discuss said he "would expect" that the LICENSE file made it clear which files were mapped to these non-AL licenses as well as having the correct headers in the source.
So, I figure we should do it just to be safe. You may not need to list every file if you can list a whole folder. -Alex On 3/27/14 5:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> And in license list the files not under Apache > >There is no need to list the files as far as I'm aware as the header give >the licence. [1] > >Justin > >1. https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
