I would change the notice to say that some of the code (instead of original, since original is Adobe) was developed by DP.
The LICENSE file should have the flex lib MIT license with including copyright, and the Adobe BSD with copyright. I would like to hear from Mike about the contributor agreement before we know that these two files are truly correct. -Alex On 3/27/14 4:55 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >Going through and fixing the headers I noticed that this file Is from >flexlib (MIT licensed). > >/FlexUnit4UIListener/src/org/flexunit/flexui/controls/PromptingTextInput.a >s > >And these 2 files were missing from the list which I assume should be >Adobe licensed. >/FlexUnit4UIListener/src/org/flexunit/flexui/data/filter/IgnoredTestFuncti >onStatus.as >/FlexUnit4UIListener/src/org/flexunit/listeners/UIListener.as > >Now that we have reverted the headers there is no need to add Adobe (or >FlexLib) to the NOTICE file. Correct? > >Is there anything else that needs to be done before I make another >release candidate? > >Thanks, >Justin
