On 3/27/14 7:16 PM, "Michael A. Labriola" <labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
>>I would change the notice to say that some of the code (instead of >>original, since original is Adobe) was developed by DP. > >It was not originally Adobe code. FlexUnit 4 is a complete rewrite. We >included FlexUnit1 for backward compatibility. FlexUnit 4 will run >without a single line of Adobe code. It was not based on Adobe code. It >did not extend Adobe code. It was originally written to replace Adobe >code. It's a port of JUnit 4 to ActionScript with a lot of changes as we >don't have threads and the addition of more features. FlexUnit1 was a >port of JUnit 3. Therefore both projects are based on JUnit and you could >instead considering crediting Kent Beck. It still looks to me like two Adobe files are in FlexUnit4CIListener (TestCaseReport and TestSuiteReport). They are not significant, but that's what I see. Yes, the vast majority of the code is based on DP-written code, but I think we have to get this right since we asked about it on legal-discuss. -Alex
