Hi, I have quickly tested the new 4.11 RC1.
It looks good to me.
I will continue to do further testing, but this is an "early" report already.
------------------------------
Apache Flex 4.11 RC1 Test report :
Configuration:
OS=Windown 7
Locale: FR
Downloaded version:
- Using Apache Flex installer (current version,not the new one)
-downloaded 4.11.0 RC1 (dev only) with AIR 3.8 / FP 11.8 / all options checked
-used osmf.swc 1.2
Test with FB: 4.7
=> SDK is recognized, version is OK
- Compile and run sample mobile App, using latest 4.11 features ( Mobile grid)
=> OK
- run on ADL at various DPI (120, 240, 320) => OK
Test with IntelliJ 12.1.4
=> SDK is recognized, version is OK
- Compile and run large desktop app:
- using latest 4.11 features (desktop Callout)
- modular ap
- wild testing: run through the UI and clicked everywhere, with a focus on
DataGrids
=> OK, no regression
Regards,
Maurice
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:[email protected]]
Envoyé : samedi 12 octobre 2013 18:50
À : [email protected]
Objet : RE: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.11.0 RC 1
Hi,
- when I start the installer to download 4.11 RC1, the default choice is on AIR
3.8 / FP 11.8, although AIR 3.9 / FP 11.9 are in the list.
Is that intended?
- I am testing 4.11 RC1 with AIR 3.8 / FP11.8, so that they are some
"diversity" in testing config.
If you prefer that I test with AIR 3.9 / FP 11.9, let me know.
Maurice
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : samedi 12 octobre
2013 10:46 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.11.0
RC 1
Hi,
> I never said I don't build the binary myself.
Ah sorry some confusion there I has assumed by this:
"The make scripts never worked for me on my Windows machine."
And other bits of the conversation that you weren't compiling it, my mistake.
> I build sdk binary and load the Installer via the commandline,
> pointing it to the sdk binary in the hard disk.
I can't see any issues with that.
> Agreed. But some PMC members need to test the published binaries as
> well, because it is part of the release and someone needs to make sure it
> works.
Binaries are not part of an official release (or even the VOTE), but yes we
need to make sure they also work.
> As I said, without the Installer, testing a binary (that I build),
> with various FP/AIR runtimes is very hard.
I did write a number of .sh scripts to switch AIR and FP versions (in the ide
directory) perhaps they could be converted to .bat files by someone?
Thanks,
Justin
