On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi, > > > I dont think it is a valid test of the RC if the Installer is downloading > > the wrong OSMF swc. > I only put it there as a convenience to people who can't compile the SDK. > People who have binding votes shouldn't be using the installer :-) > > I am not ashamed to accept that I cannot install the SDK(for the IDE) without the Installer :-) The make scripts never worked for me on my Windows machine. > > In that case, you should probably revert the change to downloads.xml. > > > > Another option is we can put up a new config.xml that points to OSMF.swc > > 2.0 and ask RC testers to side-load the new config xml into the Installer > > via the commandline. > > Up to you what ever you think is best, but the first option will stop the > RC from getting more widely tested and the second option isn't that much > help to people who don't want to compile the SDK (IMO) as they probably > don;t want to stuff about with config files and the command line. > > I prefer the second option. This is how we tested previous releases. Loading a config file from the command line is quite straightforward. I can set this up and send the instructions if you (or anyone else) dont have objections. Thanks, Om > Thanks, > Justin
