Sorry, read into the source a bit more -- looks like it is the font support, not Batik.
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as>wrote: > During a build from source with the ANT script, we are still prompting for > acceptance for a non-compatible license for what seems to be Batik. We then > proceed to download Batik from an Apache web server. Is Batik still > covered by the Adobe license? (I think the prompt is for Batik -- the > prompt doesn't echo which JARs or files it specifically pertains to). > > Still going through my testing suite otherwise. The regular things (RAT, > checksums, local mustella run) seem to be fine. > > -Nick > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Justin Mclean > <jus...@classsoftware.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please place all discussion around the release candidate here and not in >> the [VOTE] thread. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin > > >
