Never mind. I'm not seeing the problem in that test app.

I'll have to figure out how to create a test case later…

On Sep 2, 2013, at 6:04 PM, Harbs wrote:

> Just pull my test app off here 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33693
> 
> And add in \u2028 somewhere to create a line break. (I think \u000A will do 
> the same.)
> 
> On Sep 2, 2013, at 5:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> 
>> Yup, definitely possible.
>> 
>> If you can make a small test case I will take a look.  For now, set the
>> ContainerController flag to false to get back to old behavior.
>> 
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 9/2/13 7:40 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Alex,
>>> 
>>> Is it possible that your latest changes broke the cursor movement for
>>> soft line breaks?
>>> 
>>> Here's the behavior I'm seeing in 4.10.0:
>>> 
>>> With a line break (no new paragraph), and the cursor at the beginning of
>>> the new line I'm seeing the following:
>>> A backspace will delete the line break
>>> Left arrow will move the cursor to the previous line.
>>> 
>>> In the latest development build:
>>> Neither backspace or back arrow do anything.
>>> 
>>> It looks like this:
>>>                                     var beginPrevious:int =
>>> NavigationUtil.previousAtomPosition(textFlow,
>>> operationState.absoluteStart);
>>> returns the same value as the operationState.absoluteStart when the
>>> cursor is right before a line return.
>>> 
>>> Harbs
>>> 
>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>> 
>>>> OK, pushed my changes.  Have fun.
>>>> 
>>>> On 8/31/13 9:40 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 8/31/13 9:31 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Do you mean the user would have to manually set back the version
>>>>>> number
>>>>>> when they compile?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That does sound like a bitter pill to swallow. Setting internal
>>>>>> variables
>>>>>> sounds much more palatable to me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'll create an internal bool handleShiftAsSoftReturn which will
>>>>>> default
>>>>>> to true.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Makes sense?
>>>>> Yep, that's what I would do.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Let me check in my most recent changes to support discretionary hyphens
>>>>> before you get started so we don't get merge conflicts.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to