I thought I was alone in finding 4.10 confusing. I think it might be a good idea to call this 4.9.5 or 5.0 On 27 Jul 2013 07:20, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > On 7/26/13 5:51 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >> 1. Folks using ResourceModules via flashvars will get exceptions. The > >> population affected is small, but enough folks use them that already two > >> folks on our dev list have said they are affected. > >But your fix fixes this right? > Yes > > > >> 2. The default template for new projects in Flash Builder is incorrect. > >> This gives a bad first impression on new users. > >Possible the more serious issue from a perception view anyway. Although > >it the code could be easily fixed in FB (just the number parsing right?) > >it may be difficult for Adobe to do so and release in a timely manner. > > > >Changing the version to 4.9.5 or similar just seems a bit silly. If we > >change flex-description but leave the version number at 4.10 we may run > >into other issues with version compatibility checks in the sdk. While I > >don;t think any for 4.9 or 4.10 have been added there are potential > >issues if we do that. > > > >> 3. LCDS customers will receive verify errors when using mx.data.DataItem > >> and users with custom IList implementations will need to upgrade their > >> implementations. > >Do you read the bottom of > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33631? There is a workaround. > >"I delete the service from flash builder with all the as files and added > >the service again through the wizard with the same php file. > >Compiled the project and it worked like a charm." > Yeah, and so I asked for more information because that just doesn't make > sense to me, plus even if it does work, we need to find out why so we can > instruct folks who don't have FB. And then there's all of the other pain > folks have already warned us with their custom Ilists. I think the better > move is to revert. > > > >> For #2: The FB code is assuming that versions in > >>flex-sdk-description.xml > >> are single digits > > > >The parsing reg exp pasted in another thread doesn't look to be the issue. > > > > It contains \\d+ which match for more than one digit. and would parse > >4.10.0 with that expression as "4.10.0", ".10.0" and ".0". > OK, I'll keep looking then. I haven't tried it myself. Are folks who are > hitting this using FB 4.7 or FB 4.6? > > -Alex > >
