+1, with the reservation that we don't want any and all code out there ;-) EdB
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:58 PM, aYo ~ <a...@binitie.com> wrote: > If the donated assets are relevant to flex development I see no reason why > not. Development of those assets ceased mainly because there was a loss of > faith, we on the other hand believe in the project and are moving it on, > n'est pas ? > On 28 May 2013 18:50, "Jeffry Houser" <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote: > >> On 5/28/2013 12:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >> >>> Personally, I'd >>> be ok with Apache Flex being a warehouse of all kinds of Flex-related code >>> even if there is no active development for it. >>> >> >> What do others think of this sentiment? >> >> I could get the Flextras components donated, but didn't because assumed >> Apache Flex didn't want to be the dumping ground for 'abandoned code' >> >> >> -- >> Jeffry Houser >> Technical Entrepreneur >> 203-379-0773 >> -- >> http://www.flextras.com?c=104 >> UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! >> -- >> http://www.theflexshow.com >> http://www.jeffryhouser.com >> http://www.asktheflexpert.com >> -- >> Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust >> >> -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
