If the donated assets are relevant to flex development I see no reason why not. Development of those assets ceased mainly because there was a loss of faith, we on the other hand believe in the project and are moving it on, n'est pas ? On 28 May 2013 18:50, "Jeffry Houser" <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote:
> On 5/28/2013 12:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> Personally, I'd >> be ok with Apache Flex being a warehouse of all kinds of Flex-related code >> even if there is no active development for it. >> > > What do others think of this sentiment? > > I could get the Flextras components donated, but didn't because assumed > Apache Flex didn't want to be the dumping ground for 'abandoned code' > > > -- > Jeffry Houser > Technical Entrepreneur > 203-379-0773 > -- > http://www.flextras.com?c=104 > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! > -- > http://www.theflexshow.com > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > http://www.asktheflexpert.com > -- > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust > >
