I think 'git branch -r' may list the remote branches even if you don't have 
corresponding local branches.

- Gordon

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:53 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [FalconJX][FlexJS] committing?

That's something I don't like about Git. I have to pull to see a listing of new 
public branches.


On 4/24/13 12:35 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:

> There is (in my GUI at least) now a remote branch 'goog.events'.
> 
> EdB
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> Also, I am not seeing a new public branch for these changes.  Did you 
>> just commit them instead?
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/24/13 12:08 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm just starting to look at the diffs. But please, no variables 
>>> named "assing" :-)
>>> 
>>> So do you really believe it will take more than 6K of minified code 
>>> to fix any bugs related to events in the current implementation?
>>> 
>>> I'm wondering if the motivation behind goog.events is to get an 
>>> event system to work across a lot of older browsers we don't care 
>>> about these days like
>>> IE6 and IE7.  If that's the case, why take on all of that code?
>>> 
>>> I know when Adobe wrote the JS layer for BrowserManager it had a lot 
>>> of code paths we can probably drop if we don't have to support older 
>>> browsers.
>>> 
>>> I wouldn't want to take a 6K hit unless we really understand what 
>>> we're getting for it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 4/24/13 11:45 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> In short (I have the branch updated and ready to be published: yes 
>>>> to all
>>>> three:
>>>> 
>>>> 1) it adds about 6k to the file (26k -> 32k)
>>>> 2) yes, without modification, so no more IE8Utils or whatever
>>>> 3) yes
>>>> 
>>>> But I'll still publish a branch first, so you can see for yourself 
>>>> (there are some other changes/fixes in there as well).
>>>> 
>>>> EdB
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>> I think I don't have any more commits planned on for flex-asjs 
>>>>> unless there is a bug fix or two.  I'm planning to work on a COMPC 
>>>>> equivalent for FalconJX.
>>>>> 
>>>>> My only criteria for your proposed switch to goog.events are:
>>>>> 1) is the minified js for the example as small as what we have now?
>>>>> 2) does it work on IE8?
>>>>> 3) when writing AS code, do we still get to use dispatchEvent(new 
>>>>> Event())?
>>>>> 
>>>>> If the answer to all 3 is yes, then I don't have a problem moving 
>>>>> over to goog.events.  Otherwise, I would say the status quo is the better 
>>>>> choice.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 4/24/13 11:21 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> BTW: the re-write/refactoring was somewhat major, so I plan to 
>>>>>> publish my branch first, so we can review and discuss. It will 
>>>>>> still be nice to have it on par with the 'develop' branch initially, 
>>>>>> though.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> EdB
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Erik de Bruin 
>>>>>> <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Alex,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I see you're doing some committing. I have the 'goog.events' 
>>>>>>> based framework done for a previous version of FlexJS and I'm 
>>>>>>> not waiting to update it to the latest and greatest.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Do you have any more commits planned for 'today'?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> EdB
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295
>>>>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alex Harui
>>>>> Flex SDK Team
>>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Alex Harui
>> Flex SDK Team
>> Adobe Systems, Inc.
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>> 
> 
> 

--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to