A pull is a fetch and a merge, so if you just fetch instead, I don't think "you have to deal with modified files locally".
--Dasa On Apr 24, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > Sure, but either way, "git branch -all" doesn't seem to check the repo. The > list of remotes is stale. You have to fetch or pull which means you have to > deal with modified files locally. > > > On 4/24/13 1:17 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > >> Right, Alex try "fetch" command instead of "pull" >> >> 2013/4/24 Dasa Paddock <dpadd...@esri.com> >> >>> You can just "fetch" instead: >>> http://git-scm.com/docs/git-fetch >>> >>> --Dasa >>> >>> On Apr 24, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>>> That's something I don't like about Git. I have to pull to see a listing >>> of >>>> new public branches. >>> >>> >> > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
