> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Zhou [mailto:jianjay.z...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2018 9:34 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; Zhang, Roy
> Fan <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>; tho...@monjalon.net;
> arei.gong...@huawei.com; Zeng, Xin <xin.z...@intel.com>;
> weidong.hu...@huawei.com; wangxinxin.w...@huawei.com;
> longpe...@huawei.com; jianjay.z...@huawei.com
> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/7] cryptodev/virtio: core code of crypto devices

Use crypto/virtio: ...


> 
> The idea comes from QAT and virtio-net devices.

Could you elaborate a bit more here? Which idea?
Probably better to describe the patch and not compare with other devices.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jay Zhou <jianjay.z...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_capabilities.h |   51 +
>  drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_cryptodev.c           | 1553
> ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_cryptodev.h           |   66 +
>  drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c                |  540 +++++++
>  4 files changed, 2210 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_capabilities.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_cryptodev.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_cryptodev.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c

...

> index 0000000..8affbef
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_cryptodev.c

...

+
> +static int virtio_crypto_sym_pad_cipher_param(
> +             struct virtio_crypto_cipher_session_para *para,
> +             struct rte_crypto_cipher_xform *cipher_xform)
> +{
> +     switch (cipher_xform->algo) {
> +     case RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_NULL:
> +             para->algo = VIRTIO_CRYPTO_NO_CIPHER;
> +             break;
> +     case RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_3DES_CBC:
> +             para->algo = VIRTIO_CRYPTO_CIPHER_3DES_CBC;
> +             break;

Do you support these algorithms? From capabilities, it looks like you only 
support AES-CBC and SHA1,
but from the cover letter, you say that those are the ones that you have 
tested, which means that
this PMD actually supports more?


> +     case RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_3DES_CTR:
> +             para->algo = VIRTIO_CRYPTO_CIPHER_3DES_CTR;
> +             break;

...

> +RTE_PMD_REGISTER_PCI(CRYPTODEV_NAME_VIRTIO_PMD,
> rte_virtio_crypto_driver);
> +RTE_PMD_REGISTER_CRYPTO_DRIVER(virtio_crypto_drv,
> rte_virtio_crypto_driver,
> +             cryptodev_virtio_driver_id);

RTE_PMD_REGISTER_CRYPTO_DRIVER has changed. Could you rebase against 
dpdk-next-crypto?
You need to pass rte_virtio_crypto_driver.driver as a second parameter.


Reply via email to