-----Original Message-----
> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:41:14 +0530
> From: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> CC: jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com, olivier.m...@6wind.com,
>  santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com
> Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] mbuf: add user command line config mempools ops API
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4
> 
> This patch add the user command line configured mempool ops name
> API to librte_mbuf and sends a deprecation notice to remove the
> similar API from eal.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst |  7 +++++++
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c           |  8 +++++++-
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h           | 10 ++++++++++
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst 
> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index 13e8543..ec8018f 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -8,6 +8,13 @@ API and ABI deprecation notices are to be posted here.
>  Deprecation Notices
>  -------------------
>  
> +* eal: a mbuf specific API was part of eal APIs. This is now being
> +  moved to librte_mbuf to be with other similar APIs.
> +  The following API is target to be deprecated on 18.05.
> +
> +  - ``rte_eal_mbuf_default_mempool_ops`` replaced by
> +     ``rte_mbuf_user_mempool_ops''
> +

I think, deprecation notice need to be in a separate 'doc" patch.


>  * eal: several API and ABI changes are planned for ``rte_devargs`` in v18.02.
>    The format of device command line parameters will change. The bus will need
>    to be explicitly stated in the device declaration. The enum ``rte_devtype``
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> index 482676c..c587d3a 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c
> @@ -168,12 +168,18 @@ rte_mbuf_platform_mempool_ops(void)
>       return internal_config.plat_mbuf_pool_ops_name;
>  }
>  
> +const char *
> +rte_mbuf_user_mempool_ops(void)
> +{
> +     return internal_config.user_mbuf_pool_ops_name;
> +}
> +
>  /* Return mbuf pool ops name */
>  static const char *
>  rte_mbuf_best_mempool_ops(void)
>  {
>       /* User defined mempool ops takes the priority */
> -     const char *best_ops = rte_eal_mbuf_default_mempool_ops();

I think, we may need to remove the stale rte_eal_mbuf_default_mempool_ops() once
it is replaced.

> +     const char *best_ops = rte_mbuf_user_mempool_ops();
>       if (best_ops)
>               return best_ops;
>  
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> index f958e3c..7feacc0 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> @@ -1143,6 +1143,16 @@ const char*
>  rte_mbuf_platform_mempool_ops(void);
>  
>  /**
> + * Get user command line configured pool ops name for mbuf
> + *
> + * @return
> + *   returns user pool ops name.
> + */
> +
> +const char*
> +rte_mbuf_user_mempool_ops(void);
> +
> +/**
>   * Get the data room size of mbufs stored in a pktmbuf_pool
>   *
>   * The data room size is the amount of data that can be stored in a
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map 
> b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map
> index 9b53502..d4af497 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_version.map
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ DPDK_18.02 {
>  
>       rte_mbuf_platform_mempool_ops;
>       rte_mbuf_register_platform_mempool_ops;
> +     rte_mbuf_user_mempool_ops;
>       rte_pktmbuf_pool_create_specific;
>  
>  } DPDK_16.11;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

Reply via email to