On 6/22/2017 1:30 PM, John Miller wrote: > Provide unique user data pointer in the extension calls for > each port.
Hi John, Can you please give more details about why this is done. I can see in adapter data user_data pointer kept per port now, but why? What was observed with previous code? If this is to fix something, what we should expect to be fixed? And there is mtu_set implementation, is it related modification? Can be separated to another patch? Thanks, ferruh > > Signed-off-by: John Miller <john.mil...@atomicrules.com> <...>
