On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 09:41:35AM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 1/22/2017 2:45 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:27:43PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> >> On 1/20/2017 11:21 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> >>> On 1/20/2017 8:04 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> >>>> Fix an silly error by auto-complete while managing the merge conflicts.
> >>>> It's the eth_dev_data (but not eth_dev) entry should be memset.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: d948f596fee2 ("ethdev: fix port data mismatched in multiple
> >>>> process model")
> >>>>
> >>>> Reported-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan....@linux.intel.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 2 +-
> >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >>>> b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >>>> index 4790faf..61f44e2 100644
> >>>> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >>>> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev *
> >>>> return NULL;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> - memset(&rte_eth_devices[port_id], 0, sizeof(*eth_dev->data));
> >>>> + memset(&rte_eth_dev_data[port_id], 0, sizeof(struct
> >>>> rte_eth_dev_data));
> >>>
> >>> Not directly related to the this issue, but, after fix, this may have
> >>> issues with secondary process.
> >>>
> >>> There were patches sent to fix this.
> >>
> >> I mean this one:
> >> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-January/054422.html
> >
> > d948f596fee2 ("ethdev: fix port data mismatched in multiple process
> > model") should have fixed it.
>
> Think about case, where secondary process uses a virtual PMD, which does
> a rte_eth_dev_allocate() call, shouldn't this corrupt primary process
> device data?
Yes, it may. However, I doubt that's the typical usage. Besides that,
most of virtual PMDs don't support Multipleprocess: git grep shows pcap
is the only one that does claim Multipleprocess is supported.
--yliu
