On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:27:43PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 1/20/2017 11:21 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 1/20/2017 8:04 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> >> Fix an silly error by auto-complete while managing the merge conflicts.
> >> It's the eth_dev_data (but not eth_dev) entry should be memset.
> >>
> >> Fixes: d948f596fee2 ("ethdev: fix port data mismatched in multiple process
> >> model")
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan....@linux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >> index 4790faf..61f44e2 100644
> >> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev *
> >> return NULL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - memset(&rte_eth_devices[port_id], 0, sizeof(*eth_dev->data));
> >> + memset(&rte_eth_dev_data[port_id], 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_dev_data));
> >
> > Not directly related to the this issue, but, after fix, this may have
> > issues with secondary process.
> >
> > There were patches sent to fix this.
>
> I mean this one:
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-January/054422.html
d948f596fee2 ("ethdev: fix port data mismatched in multiple process
model") should have fixed it.
--yliu
