On 13/1/2017 3:19 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:50:43AM +0000, David Hunt wrote:
Now sends bursts of up to 8 mbufs to each worker, and tracks
the in-flight flow-ids (atomic scheduling)
New file with a new api, similar to the old API except with _burst
at the end of the function names
Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.h...@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_distributor/Makefile | 2 +
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c | 72 +--
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_burst.c | 558 +++++++++++++++++++++
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_burst.h | 255 ++++++++++
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_priv.h | 189 +++++++
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_version.map | 9 +
6 files changed, 1014 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_burst.c
create mode 100644 lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_burst.h
create mode 100644 lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_priv.h
Run a documentation sanity check after this patch throws up a few
warnings:
--- /dev/null 2017-01-10 10:26:01.206201474 +0000
+++ /tmp/doc-check/doc.txt 2017-01-13 15:19:50.717102848 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+/home/bruce/dpdk-clean/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_burst.h:187:
warning: argument 'mbuf' of command @param is not found in the argument
list of rte_distributor_return_pkt_burst(struct rte_distributor_burst
*d, unsigned int worker_id, struct rte_mbuf **oldpkt, int num)
+/home/bruce/dpdk-clean/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_burst.h:199:
warning: The following parameters of
rte_distributor_return_pkt_burst(struct rte_distributor_burst *d,
unsigned int worker_id, struct rte_mbuf **oldpkt, int num) are not
documented:
+ parameter 'oldpkt'
+ parameter 'num'
+/home/bruce/dpdk-clean/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_priv.h:73:
warning: Found unknown command `\in_flight_bitmask'
+/home/bruce/dpdk-clean/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_priv.h:73:
warning: Found unknown command `\rte_distributor_process'
Regards,
/Bruce
Will be cleaned up in next revsion.
Thanks,
Dave.
