On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 07:50:43AM +0000, David Hunt wrote: > Now sends bursts of up to 8 mbufs to each worker, and tracks > the in-flight flow-ids (atomic scheduling) > > New file with a new api, similar to the old API except with _burst > at the end of the function names > > Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.h...@intel.com> > --- > lib/librte_distributor/Makefile | 2 + > lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c | 72 +-- > lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_burst.c | 558 > +++++++++++++++++++++ > lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_burst.h | 255 ++++++++++ > lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_priv.h | 189 +++++++ > lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_version.map | 9 + > 6 files changed, 1014 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_burst.c > create mode 100644 lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_burst.h > create mode 100644 lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_priv.h > Run a documentation sanity check after this patch throws up a few warnings:
--- /dev/null 2017-01-10 10:26:01.206201474 +0000 +++ /tmp/doc-check/doc.txt 2017-01-13 15:19:50.717102848 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +/home/bruce/dpdk-clean/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_burst.h:187: warning: argument 'mbuf' of command @param is not found in the argument list of rte_distributor_return_pkt_burst(struct rte_distributor_burst *d, unsigned int worker_id, struct rte_mbuf **oldpkt, int num) +/home/bruce/dpdk-clean/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_burst.h:199: warning: The following parameters of rte_distributor_return_pkt_burst(struct rte_distributor_burst *d, unsigned int worker_id, struct rte_mbuf **oldpkt, int num) are not documented: + parameter 'oldpkt' + parameter 'num' +/home/bruce/dpdk-clean/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_priv.h:73: warning: Found unknown command `\in_flight_bitmask' +/home/bruce/dpdk-clean/lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_priv.h:73: warning: Found unknown command `\rte_distributor_process' Regards, /Bruce
