-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 7:05 AM
To: Yang, Qiming <qiming.y...@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Zhang, Helin
<helin.zh...@intel.com>; Horton, Remy <remy.hor...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/5] ethdev: add firmware version get
On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 12:11:31 +0800
Qiming Yang <qiming.y...@intel.com> wrote:
> void
> +rte_eth_dev_fw_version_get(uint8_t port_id, char *fw_version, int
> +fw_length) {
> + struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> +
> + RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_RET(port_id);
> + dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> +
> + RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->fw_version_get);
> + (*dev->dev_ops->fw_version_get)(dev, fw_version, fw_length); }
Maybe dev argument to fw_version_get should be:
const struct rte_eth_dev *dev
Qiming: do you means the argument to ops fw_version_get?
why should add 'const'? both two are OK, but we usually use struct rte_eth_dev
*dev.
