On 12/7/2016 6:41 AM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> On 12/7/2016 1:18 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 12/4/2016 6:17 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
>>> ---
>>> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>> index 3c45a1f..6f5673f 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
>>> @@ -1626,6 +1626,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev {
>>> eth_rx_burst_t rx_pkt_burst; /**< Pointer to PMD receive function. */
>>> eth_tx_burst_t tx_pkt_burst; /**< Pointer to PMD transmit function. */
>>> struct rte_eth_dev_data *data; /**< Pointer to device data */
>>> + struct rte_device *device;
>>
>> I believe this change should not be part of a PMD patchset. This change
>> is more generic than the PMD.
>>
>> Won't Shreyansh's patch already do this?
>
> I agree that this patch is not a fit for this PMD patchset, Shreyansh's
> patch is not yet doing it. He will be taking care of it next.
>
> So till Shreyansh provide the support, we need it.
If you need it, what do you think sending this as a separate patch? And
when accepted, your driver can use it?
>
>>
>>> const struct eth_driver *driver;/**< Driver for this device */
>>> const struct eth_dev_ops *dev_ops; /**< Functions exported by PMD */
>>> struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /**< PCI info. supplied by probing */
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
