On 12/4/2016 6:17 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com> > --- > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h > index 3c45a1f..6f5673f 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h > +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h > @@ -1626,6 +1626,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev { > eth_rx_burst_t rx_pkt_burst; /**< Pointer to PMD receive function. */ > eth_tx_burst_t tx_pkt_burst; /**< Pointer to PMD transmit function. */ > struct rte_eth_dev_data *data; /**< Pointer to device data */ > + struct rte_device *device;
I believe this change should not be part of a PMD patchset. This change is more generic than the PMD. Won't Shreyansh's patch already do this? > const struct eth_driver *driver;/**< Driver for this device */ > const struct eth_dev_ops *dev_ops; /**< Functions exported by PMD */ > struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /**< PCI info. supplied by probing */ >