On 12/4/2016 6:17 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
> index 3c45a1f..6f5673f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
> @@ -1626,6 +1626,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev {
>       eth_rx_burst_t rx_pkt_burst; /**< Pointer to PMD receive function. */
>       eth_tx_burst_t tx_pkt_burst; /**< Pointer to PMD transmit function. */
>       struct rte_eth_dev_data *data;  /**< Pointer to device data */
> +     struct rte_device *device;

I believe this change should not be part of a PMD patchset. This change
is more generic than the PMD.

Won't Shreyansh's patch already do this?

>       const struct eth_driver *driver;/**< Driver for this device */
>       const struct eth_dev_ops *dev_ops; /**< Functions exported by PMD */
>       struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /**< PCI info. supplied by probing */
> 

Reply via email to