Hi Ferruh,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 2:26 PM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 16/32] net/i40e: add set VF VLAN insert
> function
>
> On 12/7/2016 3:31 AM, Wenzhuo Lu wrote:
> > Support inserting VF VLAN id from PF.
> > User can call the API on PF to insert a VLAN id to a specific VF.
>
> Same comment with prev patch, does it make sense to insert " from PF" to
> patch title?
Consistency in the patch titles makes sense.
"set VF VLAN filter from PF" might be better.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 53
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e.h | 19 +++++++++++
> > drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e_version.map | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 253209b..c571d8b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > @@ -10361,3 +10361,56 @@ static void i40e_set_default_mac_addr(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > else
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > +
> > +int rte_pmd_i40e_set_vf_vlan_insert(uint8_t port, uint16_t vf_id,
> > + uint16_t vlan_id)
> > +{
> > + struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> > + struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
> > + struct i40e_pf *pf;
> > + struct i40e_pf_vf *vf;
> > + struct i40e_hw *hw;
> > + struct i40e_vsi *vsi;
> > + struct i40e_vsi_context ctxt;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port, -ENODEV);
> > +
> > + dev = &rte_eth_devices[port];
> > + rte_eth_dev_info_get(port, &dev_info);
> > +
> > + pf = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_PF(dev->data->dev_private);
> > + hw = I40E_PF_TO_HW(pf);
> > +
> > + /**
> > + * return -ENODEV if SRIOV not enabled, VF number not configured
> > + * or no queue assigned.
> > + */
> > + if (!hw->func_caps.sr_iov_1_1 || pf->vf_num == 0 ||
> > + pf->vf_nb_qps == 0)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + if (vf_id > pf->vf_num)
if (vf_id >= pf->vf_num)
would be better.
> This check was [1] in prev patches:
> [1]
> if (vf_id > pf->vf_num - 1 || !pf->vfs)
if (vf_id >= pf->vf_num || !pf->vfs)
would be better.
>
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (vlan_id > 4095)
>
> Can there be any define in base driver for this? Or ETH_VLAN_ID_MAX
> perhaps?
ETHER_MAX_VLAN_ID in rte_ether.h should be used .
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + vf = &pf->vfs[vf_id];
> > + vsi = vf->vsi;
> > +
> > + vsi->info.valid_sections =
> cpu_to_le16(I40E_AQ_VSI_PROP_VLAN_VALID);
> > + vsi->info.port_vlan_flags |= I40E_AQ_VSI_PVLAN_INSERT_PVID;
> > + vsi->info.pvid = vlan_id;
> > +
>
> --->
> > + memset(&ctxt, 0, sizeof(ctxt));
> > + (void)rte_memcpy(&ctxt.info, &vsi->info, sizeof(vsi->info));
> > + ctxt.seid = vsi->seid;
> > +
> > + hw = I40E_VSI_TO_HW(vsi);
> > + ret = i40e_aq_update_vsi_params(hw, &ctxt, NULL);
> > + if (ret != I40E_SUCCESS)
> > + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to update VSI params");
> <-----
>
> If Wenzhuo prefers to extract this part into a function, it can be re-used
> here
> too.
>
> <...>
