> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 2:16 AM
> To: Guo, Jia; Zhang, Helin; Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] drivers/i40e: fix the hash filter invalid
> calculation in X722
>
> On 9/26/2016 11:51 AM, Jeff Guo wrote:
> > As X722 extracts IPv4 header to Field Vector different with
> > XL710/X710, need to corresponding to modify the fields of IPv4 header
> > in input set to map different default Field Vector Table of different nics.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 77
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index b04c833..9b4c71f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > @@ -211,6 +211,18 @@
> > #define I40E_REG_INSET_L3_SRC_IP4 0x0001800000000000ULL
> > /* Destination IPv4 address */
> > #define I40E_REG_INSET_L3_DST_IP4 0x0000001800000000ULL
> > +#ifdef X722_SUPPORT
> > +/* Source IPv4 address for X722 */
> > +#define I40E_X722_REG_INSET_L3_SRC_IP4 0x0006000000000000ULL
>
> These macros defined here within "#ifdef X722_SUPPORT" and later used
> unconditionally, this will cause a compile error when "X722_SUPPORT" not
> defined.
These macros defined are used in condition later. Maybe the compile error
Already exist in current driver. We need to check that and fix this.
>
> > +/* Destination IPv4 address for X722 */
> > +#define I40E_X722_REG_INSET_L3_DST_IP4 0x0000060000000000ULL
> > +/* IPv4 Type of Service (TOS) */
> > +#define I40E_X722_REG_INSET_L3_IP4_TOS 0x0040000000000000ULL
>
> This value seems same as I40E_REG_INSET_L3_IP4_TOS, why creating a X722
> version of this?
>
> > +/* IPv4 Protocol */
> > +#define I40E_X722_REG_INSET_L3_IP4_PROTO
> 0x0010000000000000ULL
> > +/* IPv4 Time to Live */
> > +#define I40E_X722_REG_INSET_L3_IP4_TTL 0x0010000000000000ULL
> > +#endif
> > /* IPv4 Type of Service (TOS) */
> > #define I40E_REG_INSET_L3_IP4_TOS 0x0040000000000000ULL
> > /* IPv4 Protocol */
> > @@ -7372,7 +7384,7 @@ i40e_parse_input_set(uint64_t *inset,
> > * and vice versa
> > */
> > static uint64_t
> > -i40e_translate_input_set_reg(uint64_t input)
> > +i40e_translate_input_set_reg(enum i40e_mac_type type, uint64_t input)
> > {
> > uint64_t val = 0;
> > uint16_t i;
> > @@ -7419,14 +7431,70 @@ i40e_translate_input_set_reg(uint64_t input)
> > {I40E_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_W8,
> I40E_REG_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_WORD8},
> > };
> >
> > + static const struct {
> > + uint64_t inset;
> > + uint64_t inset_reg;
>
> Since creating second instance of this struct, why not extract strcut
> declaration?
>
> > + } inset_map1[] = {
>
> Is it possible to use more descriptive variable name, hard to distinguish diff
> between inset_map and inset_map1.
>
> > + {I40E_INSET_DMAC, I40E_REG_INSET_L2_DMAC},
> > + {I40E_INSET_SMAC, I40E_REG_INSET_L2_SMAC},
> > + {I40E_INSET_VLAN_OUTER,
> I40E_REG_INSET_L2_OUTER_VLAN},
> > + {I40E_INSET_VLAN_INNER,
> I40E_REG_INSET_L2_INNER_VLAN},
> > + {I40E_INSET_LAST_ETHER_TYPE,
> I40E_REG_INSET_LAST_ETHER_TYPE},
>
> ---->
> > + {I40E_INSET_IPV4_SRC, I40E_X722_REG_INSET_L3_SRC_IP4},
> > + {I40E_INSET_IPV4_DST, I40E_X722_REG_INSET_L3_DST_IP4},
> > + {I40E_INSET_IPV4_TOS, I40E_X722_REG_INSET_L3_IP4_TOS},
> > + {I40E_INSET_IPV4_PROTO,
> I40E_X722_REG_INSET_L3_IP4_PROTO},
> > + {I40E_INSET_IPV4_TTL, I40E_X722_REG_INSET_L3_IP4_TTL},
> <----
> Since limited number of values are different from inset_map[], and most of
> them are duplication, is it possible to prevent duplication?
Didn't find and proposal on that. Because we need to support
I40E_X722_REG_INSET_XX and I40E_REG_INSET_XX at the same time. So it
Cannot be achieved by #ifdef and #endif.
>
> > + {I40E_INSET_IPV6_SRC, I40E_REG_INSET_L3_SRC_IP6},
> > + {I40E_INSET_IPV6_DST, I40E_REG_INSET_L3_DST_IP6},
> > + {I40E_INSET_IPV6_TC, I40E_REG_INSET_L3_IP6_TC},
> > + {I40E_INSET_IPV6_NEXT_HDR,
> I40E_REG_INSET_L3_IP6_NEXT_HDR},
> > + {I40E_INSET_IPV6_HOP_LIMIT,
> I40E_REG_INSET_L3_IP6_HOP_LIMIT},
> > + {I40E_INSET_SRC_PORT, I40E_REG_INSET_L4_SRC_PORT},
> > + {I40E_INSET_DST_PORT, I40E_REG_INSET_L4_DST_PORT},
> > + {I40E_INSET_SCTP_VT,
> I40E_REG_INSET_L4_SCTP_VERIFICATION_TAG},
> > + {I40E_INSET_TUNNEL_ID, I40E_REG_INSET_TUNNEL_ID},
> > + {I40E_INSET_TUNNEL_DMAC,
> > + I40E_REG_INSET_TUNNEL_L2_INNER_DST_MAC},
> > + {I40E_INSET_TUNNEL_IPV4_DST,
> I40E_REG_INSET_TUNNEL_L3_DST_IP4},
> > + {I40E_INSET_TUNNEL_IPV6_DST,
> I40E_REG_INSET_TUNNEL_L3_DST_IP6},
> > + {I40E_INSET_TUNNEL_SRC_PORT,
> > + I40E_REG_INSET_TUNNEL_L4_UDP_SRC_PORT},
> > + {I40E_INSET_TUNNEL_DST_PORT,
> > + I40E_REG_INSET_TUNNEL_L4_UDP_DST_PORT},
> > + {I40E_INSET_VLAN_TUNNEL,
> I40E_REG_INSET_TUNNEL_VLAN},
> > + {I40E_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_W1,
> I40E_REG_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_WORD1},
> > + {I40E_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_W2,
> I40E_REG_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_WORD2},
> > + {I40E_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_W3,
> I40E_REG_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_WORD3},
> > + {I40E_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_W4,
> I40E_REG_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_WORD4},
> > + {I40E_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_W5,
> I40E_REG_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_WORD5},
> > + {I40E_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_W6,
> I40E_REG_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_WORD6},
> > + {I40E_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_W7,
> I40E_REG_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_WORD7},
> > + {I40E_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_W8,
> I40E_REG_INSET_FLEX_PAYLOAD_WORD8},
> > + };
> > +
> > if (input == 0)
> > return val;
> >
> > /* Translate input set to register aware inset */
> > +#ifdef X722_SUPPORT
> > + if (type == I40E_MAC_X722) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(inset_map1); i++) {
> > + if (input & inset_map1[i].inset)
> > + val |= inset_map1[i].inset_reg;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(inset_map); i++) {
> > + if (input & inset_map[i].inset)
> > + val |= inset_map[i].inset_reg;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +#else
> > for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(inset_map); i++) {
> > if (input & inset_map[i].inset)
> > val |= inset_map[i].inset_reg;
> > }
> > +#endif
>
> What about something like this, to prevent duplication:
>
> inset_map_x = inset_map;
>
> #ifdef X722_SUPPORT
> if (type == I40E_MAC_X722)
> inset_map_x = inset_map1;
> #endif
>
> for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(inset_map_x); i++) {
> if (input & inset_map_x[i].inset)
> val |= inset_map_x[i].inset_reg;
> }
>
Also thought about that way, but if X722_SUPPORT is not set
Compile error will report because of unused parameter.
Thanks
Jingjing
