On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:57:46PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:17:41PM +0800, Jianbo Liu wrote:
> > On 27 June 2016 at 19:54, Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com>
> > wrote:
> > > split out SSE instruction based virtio simple rx
> > > implementation to a separate file
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c | 166 +-------------------
> > > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple_sse.h | 225
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 226 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple_sse.h
> > >
> > I think it's better to move sse implementation to a C file,
> > as Bruce pointed out at
> > http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-April/037937.html
>
> I can move to C file, That would call for further restructuring of the code
> by Introducing a new file drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h and
> moving all static inline functions of virtio_rxtx_simple.c so that
> virtio_rxtx_simple_sse.c and virtio_rxtx_simple_neon.c can include it.
>
> Huawei,Yuanhan,All,
>
> Are you OK with above restructuring?
Yes, I think that's better.
--yliu
